TCPA violations: what counts, statutory damages and fines

A TCPA violation is a call, text or fax that breaks the Telephone Consumer Protection Act or the FCC rules under it, such as an autodialed marketing text sent without prior express written consent. The statute lets a person recover actual loss or a fixed statutory amount per violation, which a court may triple for willful or knowing violations.

By Russell Brown, founder of Summit LeadsUpdated How we write and check guides

This page reflects 47 U.S.C. 227 and the FCC rule text in the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations as amended through March 25, 2026, checked on October 6, 2026. It is general information, not legal advice. If you have received a claim or a demand letter, talk to a lawyer.

Key points

  • Most TCPA violations fall under 47 U.S.C. 227(b) (autodialed, prerecorded and artificial voice calls) or 227(c) (Do Not Call rules).
  • The statute sets damages per violation for private suits in 227(b)(3) and 227(c)(5), and lets states sue under 227(g).
  • The TCPA does not state a filing deadline for private suits; a federal appeals court has applied the general four-year period in 28 U.S.C. 1658(a).
  • Consent records, Do Not Call scrub records and opt-out logs are the documents used to show a call was allowed.

What counts as a TCPA violation?

A TCPA violation is a call, text message or fax that does not meet a requirement of 47 U.S.C. 227 or of the FCC rules that carry it out at 47 CFR 64.1200. Each call or message is assessed on its own, so one campaign can produce many separate violations.

The violations that come up most in lead generation fall into five groups:

Common types of TCPA violations, in general terms
Type of violationWhere the rule isExample
Autodialed or prerecorded marketing call or text to a cell phone without prior express written consent227(b)(1)(A); 64.1200(a)(2)A buyer texts a lead from an automated platform, but the form never showed consent language for texts.
Prerecorded or artificial voice marketing call to a residential line without prior express written consent227(b)(1)(B); 64.1200(a)(3)A prerecorded sales message is sent to a home landline taken from an old list.
Telephone solicitation to a number on the National Do Not Call Registry without an exemption227(c); 64.1200(c)(2)A call list is not checked against the registry before dialing.
Ignoring a request to stop64.1200(a)(10) and (d)A person replies "stop" to a text and keeps receiving marketing texts after ten business days.
Missing identification or opt-out in a prerecorded message227(d); 64.1200(b)A prerecorded message does not name the business or give a number to call.

Calling hours are also a rule: 64.1200(c)(1) bars telephone solicitations to residential subscribers before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. local time at the called party’s location. What consent each type of call needs is covered in TCPA consent.

TCPA fines and statutory damages in 47 U.S.C. 227

The statute sets out who may sue and what they may recover. The amounts below are quoted from 47 U.S.C. 227. They are per violation, which in practice usually means per call or per text.

Remedies stated in 47 U.S.C. 227
Who actsProvisionWhat the statute states
A person or entity (private suit over autodialed, prerecorded or artificial voice calls)227(b)(3)An injunction, actual monetary loss or $500 in damages for each violation, whichever is greater, or both. If the violation was willful or knowing, the court may increase the award to not more than 3 times that amount.
A person who received more than one call in 12 months by or on behalf of the same entity (Do Not Call rules)227(c)(5)An injunction, actual monetary loss or up to $500 in damages for each violation, whichever is greater, or both; up to 3 times for willful or knowing violations. Reasonable practices and procedures, set up with due care, are an affirmative defense.
A state attorney general or designated state official227(g)A civil action on behalf of residents for an injunction, actual monetary loss or $500 in damages for each violation; up to 3 times for willful or knowing violations.
The FCC227(b)(4)A forfeiture penalty under 47 U.S.C. 503(b). For violations made with intent, the statute adds a further penalty not to exceed $10,000.

What "per violation" means for lead buyers

Because damages attach to each call or text, the total grows with the number of contacts. A buyer that sends an automated sequence of several texts to one lead, without valid consent, may face a separate claim for each text. That is why consent has to be checked before the first automated contact, not after a complaint.

What is the TCPA statute of limitations?

The TCPA does not state a time limit for private lawsuits. A general federal rule fills that gap: 28 U.S.C. 1658(a) says that, except as otherwise provided by law, a civil action arising under an Act of Congress enacted after December 1, 1990 may not be commenced later than 4 years after the cause of action accrues.

Courts have applied that period to TCPA claims. In Sawyer v. Atlas Heating & Sheet Metal Works, Inc. (7th Cir. 2011), a TCPA case about unsolicited faxes, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit stated that the statute of limitations is four years under 28 U.S.C. 1658. Questions such as when a claim accrues, and whether a pending class action pauses the clock, are decided case by case.

The statute does state a limit for FCC forfeitures. Under 227(b)(4)(E), the FCC may not impose a forfeiture under 227(b)(4)(A) for a violation that occurred more than 1 year before its notice, or under 227(b)(4)(B) (violations with intent) for one that occurred more than 4 years before its notice. State telemarketing laws have their own deadlines.

For record-keeping, the point is simple: a claim can arrive years after the call. Consent records that are deleted early cannot be produced later. Retention periods are covered in TCPA consent record-keeping.

In a TCPA dispute about a lead, the main question is usually whether the person agreed to be contacted, by whom, and how. The answer comes from records. In lead generation, those records sit with different parties: the publisher or seller who ran the form, the broker or network, and the buyer who made the call.

Records that show a call or text was allowed
RecordWhat it showsWho usually holds it
Consent certificate or form captureThe page, the consent text shown, the phone number entered, the time and the deviceSeller or publisher, passed to the broker and buyer
Consent language versionWhich wording was live on the date the lead was capturedSeller or publisher
Do Not Call scrub recordThat the number was checked against the national registry and any state and internal listsThe caller (buyer or its telemarketer)
Opt-out and revocation logWhen a person asked to stop, and when calls stoppedEvery party that sends calls or texts
Delivery recordWhich buyer received the lead and whenBroker or network

Summit Leads captures TCPA consent on every lead and delivers leads with consent certificates, so a buyer can match each lead to the form and consent text behind it (how buying works). The wider lead lifecycle, from form to sale, is explained in the lead generation industry guide.

Steps to reduce the risk of a TCPA violation

  1. Map every automated contact

    List each call and text your campaign sends after a lead arrives, and note whether it uses an autodialer, a prerecorded or artificial voice, or a person dialing by hand.

  2. Match each contact to its consent

    Confirm the form’s consent language covers the seller making the contact and the type of contact (calls, texts, prerecorded messages).

  3. Check Do Not Call status

    Scrub numbers against the National Do Not Call Registry, state lists that apply and your internal list before telemarketing calls. See Do Not Call list for businesses.

  4. Honor opt-outs fast

    Process revocations from any reasonable method within ten business days, as 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(10) requires, and stop sending the lead to other buyers.

  5. Keep the records

    Store consent certificates, scrub records and opt-out logs for at least as long as a claim could be brought.

  6. Review with counsel

    Have a lawyer review your forms, scripts and call flows before launch and after any rule change.

Buying or sending MVA and home improvement leads? Every Summit lead carries a consent certificate.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming a manual dialer removes all risk. Do Not Call rules, calling hours and opt-out rules apply to telephone solicitations regardless of the dialing technology.
  • Counting a campaign as one violation. Damages in 227(b)(3) and 227(c)(5) are stated per violation, and each call or text can count.
  • Deleting consent records too soon. A claim can be filed years after the call.
  • Re-sending a lead after an opt-out. Once a person revokes consent, sellers and publishers should not send that number to another buyer.
  • Relying on rules that changed. The FCC one-to-one consent rule never took effect. Check the current rule text, not older summaries. See the one-to-one consent rule page.

For publishers

Sending traffic to Summit landers? Read the publisher traffic guidelines and TCPA basics for lead gen affiliates. For how the wider industry works, see the lead generation industry guide.

Frequently asked questions

How much is a TCPA violation?

Under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(3), a person may recover actual monetary loss or $500 for each violation, whichever is greater, and a court may increase the award to up to 3 times that amount for willful or knowing violations. See the statute.

Is there a TCPA statute of limitations?

The TCPA does not state one for private suits. The Seventh Circuit has stated that the four-year period in 28 U.S.C. 1658 applies to TCPA claims. The statute does set time limits for FCC forfeitures in 227(b)(4)(E).

Can one text message be a TCPA violation?

Yes. A marketing text sent to a cell phone with an autodialer is treated like a call under the FCC rule, so one text sent without the required consent can be a violation. See TCPA compliance for SMS leads.

Who can sue for TCPA violations?

The person who received the call or text may sue under 227(b)(3) or 227(c)(5), a state attorney general may sue under 227(g), and the FCC can impose forfeitures under 227(b)(4).

Is this legal advice?

No. This page is general information about the federal statute and rule text. Talk to a lawyer about your own calls, texts and forms.

Related guides

Sources

  1. 47 U.S.C. 227, Restrictions on use of telephone equipment, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
  2. 47 CFR 64.1200, Delivery restrictions, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
  3. 28 U.S.C. 1658, Time limitations on the commencement of civil actions arising under Acts of Congress, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
  4. Sawyer v. Atlas Heating & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., No. 10-3672 (7th Cir. 2011), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, via GovInfo

Run the traffic. We handle the rest.

Every publisher is reviewed before going live. Email us your verticals, traffic sources, states and expected volume.

Or write to team@summitleads.ai. We reply by email.

What happens next

  1. Step 1: You email us.
  2. Step 2: We reply by email.
  3. Step 3: Every publisher is reviewed, and return and payment terms are agreed during onboarding, before you go live.

Generating leads on your own forms? Sell your leads.

Written by Russell Brown, founder of Summit Leads.

Buying or selling leads? Talk to us.

Email team@summitleads.ai. We reply by email. You can also message Summit Leads or Russell Brown on LinkedIn. Contact details.